🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations worked, and revealed fresh requests had been made by mediators to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Course

Araghchi is walking a difficult path since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president claiming the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations employed their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if discussions resume.

The American leader last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the forum, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of international law, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the assaults started with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Diplomacy Remains the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the ultimate resolution to resolve disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will get a response in the same approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the wake of this attack."